更多深圳桑拿会所体验报告：http://suo.im/5PMsVq Original title: ? U of addiction of Ψ shows Cheng of ㄉ of of city of Tuo Yue of near of Po of grain Tan Mu to hold of Fu of low-lyingponding bucket of Shan of of border of ⒉ of 7 ㄔ bold high to hold 7 ㄖ high not narrow one’s eyes of calumniate of joyous dam of 5 show off complains sheng Meng Qiao Ang H of of pace ㄖ goes up fly. Sea court is in charge of before administer a person operating from within in coordination with outside forces of this area under administration by basic level court administer case of civilian trade issue mixes first instance executive case, center administer a person operating from within in coordination with outside forces of Shenzhen city area under administration by court of other grass-roots unit administer Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan of first instance concerning foreign affairs or foreign nationals, experience trade issue case, center administer before free-trade area of the sea, Shekou is general intellectual property case. Hold water more than 4 years to come, before sea court lawfully just and efficient exercise tries function, heard large quantities of one cases that have typical sense, release experience 4 times early or late from case of model of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan of experience of trade division, concerning foreign affairs or foreign nationals, guide the behaviour with body of normative business victim, big bay area mixes HongKong and Macow of service safeguard another name for Guangdong Province to be built from trade division, aid force to build stable fairness the transparent, battalion business environment that can expect. Recently, sea court was released again before new a batch of 10 grand ceremony case, involve secret of protection of business of goods of international freightage, international, intellectual property, trade tort, close fund is run, software of business of parallel entrance car, APP trades, folk entrusts transfer to other localities of conduct financial transactions, region to solve the judicatory inside region to affirm, ill will mentions the case such as jurisdictional different. Here, result of the basic details of a case of typical to this batch case, judgment, typical meaning makes brief introducing, with period give a society with how-to. 1 esteem mixes case applicable ” Montreal convention ” breed and safeguard internationalization, law to change battalion business environment — M company appeals to desk of dispute of contract of H company freightage [basic details of a case] on June 13, 2017, m company and H company are reached acceptability, h company sends Zhang sheet to M company, carry bright the amount that consigns goods, weight, destination United States, carriage means ” special railway line of UPS- United States ” , m company pays freight, delivery was consigned on June 14. On June 19, goods passes through custom Qing Dynasty, the United States is achieved after and other places of classics head Er, Tokyo, on July 10 service. During freightage, h company answer says when to carrying, grow about 15 days, m company not dissent. On July 27, consignee with goods reject to pay freight for service tardily, m company to H company claim for compensation not if really. [juridical result] the c深圳外围经纪人ifxmoteourt thinks, this case goods transfers destination to be the United States, should with ” the convention that unites international aviation to carry certain regulation ” (the following abbreviation ” Montreal convention ” ) for criterion law. Bilateral party all regulation of hep international freight and risk, m company selects the price the inferior, special railway line that 魔棒服务是怎样做的is not through transportation, mean its to accept the risk of incur loss through delay that faces possibly. Goods passes in Qing Dynasty, the boat that cross a state is airborne the incur loss through delay in be defeated 4 weekday, after H company accepts goods oneself, begin to schedule the carriage flow of goods namely, use up assiduous and responsible obligation, nonexistent fault. Basis ” Montreal convention ” regulation, h company cannot adopt relevant measure impossibly also to decrease during carrying expend, incontrollable to incur loss through delay. The court is maintained, h company does not assume responsibility of incur loss through delay. [typical meaning] in occurrence delayed transportation of in深圳罗湖kb环保ternational freightage middling, in bilateral agreement unidentified circumstance falls, easy cause dispute. This case is applicable ” Montreal convention ” regulation, from the contract the respect such as reason of agreement, carriage means, incur loss through delay and time undertakes an analysis, cognizance carrier already took all and logical step, use up assiduous obligation, do not assume responsibility to incur loss through delay. This case reflected people court in settling dispute of international trade issue, hold to the judicatory concept that opens fairly, sufficient esteem and treaty of accurate and applicable international, regular, safeguard becomes Gao Shuiping to open to the outside world from trade division construction portal hub. Flaw of business of goods of 2 accurate and divisional international fulfills case to enhance our country enterprise to be able to anticipate a gender of the activity to international trade with primary beak a contract — D company appeals to desk of dispute of contract of business of goods of P company international [basic details of a case] in December 2015, american P company purchases car of a batch of balances to Shenzhen D company, order did not carry batteries quality standard to make an agreement to balancing car place. January 2016, experience case balances a car to be detained when American Qing Dynasty closes, balance car batteries includes bogus UL brand, charger of American custom destroy by melting or burning, discharged balances a car, bilateral party accepts this plan. P company asks to terminate a contract after, requirement D company is returned return payment for goods, d company asks to fill send charger, p company cooperates D company to balance a car in the United States and Canadian market sale. D company asks to receive fund of engaging the load after 30% as commission, p company does not agree, bo深圳水疗酒店男宾招聘信息th sides causes dispute to appeal to to the court. [juridical result] the court thinks, basis ” U.N. international goods sells convention on contract ” regulation, in goods already below the circumstance of consign, behavior of break a contact should be achieved ” the need with consign beyond recall goods gives replace ” degree just makes essential break a promise, the bargainor is in when making buyer suffers unreasonable inconvenience or delay, OK still at one’s own expenses take remedial action. The goods of D company delivery is in can below seasonable remedial circumstance, contract do not answer by annul. But bilateral and acceptability after terminating a contract, d company is pressed return about return payment for goods, and its coop广东悦来香qm论坛erate to achieve experience record in P company after the car is sold, put forward to deduct commission evenly, have violate honest credence principle, company of D of reason court court decision is returned return payment for goods and freight. [typical meaning] latter, sino-US trade friction raised issue of international goods business on certain level. This case from ” U.N. international goods sells convention on contract ” regulation and encourage trading spirit to set out, the consign behavior of cognizance D company is the flaw fulfills and rather than primary beak a contract, prevented unbalance of obligation of right of contract both sides. This court decision made clear international goods business on one hand the specific cognizance standard of primary beak a contract, reflected meaning autonomy, equality adequately to protect a principle on the other hand, enhanced our country enterprise to walk out of the confidence that go. Case 3 execute the strictest intellectual property judicatory to protect safeguard to develop from drive of trade division innovation — T company accuses fabricant of kinescope of recording of W company inroad counterpoises issue desk [basic details of a case] the exclusive license that accredit of T company classics obtains product of experience record recording. T company and W company sign an agreement, be not company of exclusive accredit W to offer music to serve in its music website, deadline is came on April 1, 2017 on March 31, 2018. After conventional contract expires, w company should stop deferent accredit to music looks and be deleted instantly go up in its server relevant accredit work. On March 31, 2018 17 when make, t company tells W company, because the contract expires,ask its play a song of all experience case instantly. That day 23 when make, w company releases a message to suggest the user buys relevant song immediately. W music website still provided the d深圳雅轩休闲会所价格ownload service of goods of experience case music on April 1, 2018. [juridical result] the court thinks, after the contract expires, w music website offers the behavior that downloads a service to form tort. The company of operation firm L of W music website did not obtain relevant business certificate, depend on actually website of Y company lawful aptitude is managed, y company and L company should be collective infringer. Expire in the contract, t company asks experience record recording products falls worn case clearly already, w company takes step not in time not only, inform the user downloads as soon as possible instead, presence of its and Y company, L company is collective tort is intended, answer to assume civil responsibility jointly. The court adjudicates 3 the accused pay compensation fee to T company, backed the reasonable pay that checks tort arises. [typical meaning] this case party is famous Internet enterprise, wide attention is caused after behavior of experience case tort happens. The firm of platform of the tort in this case, real operation, company that has lawful aptitude is not same subject, your tripartite is sentenced to assume tort responsibility jointly after the court finds out a fact. This case thinks integratedly the circumstance such as character of conduct of the subjective fault degree of W company, operation, tort, consequence, inside legal maximum indemnity norm from indemnity of heavy court decision, supported T firm reasonable retaining fee to use He Weiquan reasonable defray, reflect the spirit that punishs sexual compensation adequately. This case executes protection of the strictest intellectual property judicatory, legitimate to obligee rights and interests has comprehensive safeguard, the battalion business environment that to building protection innovation drive develops has demonstrative sex sense. Case 4 reasonable limit responsibility of quote of lawsuit of commercial secret tort to guide run He Weiquan ability from promotion of 深圳外围女联系方式trade division business — A company appeals to desk of issue of secret of trade of Liu Mou enroach on [basic detail深圳大浪沐足按摩推拿s of a case] in July 2018, liu Mou holds the post of A company general manager, signed ” staff trade secret is confidential and affirmatory book ” . October, liu Mou leaves his post. A company thinks Liu Mou took away the experience secret data such as firm client data, encroached its trade secret, advocate Liu Mou stops loss of tort, compensation. Does A company advocate commercial secret of protection includes: ? Qiang orange fertile information of client of? of grave of department of Rong of gourd ladle of Gua of basketry pain or numbness caused by cold Home ぷ thighing and深圳按摩环保论坛 system of reward of firewood of employee information; try health of traffic programme, VIP client to manage satisfaction of archives watch, customer to spend examine, VIP member card is endowment cost catalog, beautiful round formula project. Liu some argue weighs his not the business of hold A company is private, did not violate confidential agreement. [juridical result] the court thinks, commercial secret should have secret sex, commercial value sex and confidential sex. The commercial secret coincidence method that accuser should provide evidence to prove its advocate makes important document and the fact that are encroached surely. The member of specific content;VIP that A company did not submit information of proceedings sound, client and employee information blocks endowment cost watch of project of catalog, beautiful round formula needs to be made public to the client, it is certain that without firewood of secret sex; reward system tries traffic programme enterprise to be able to be in give inside limits confidential, have commercial value, but A company did not offer evidence to prove this trade secret is gotten with wrong step by other, announce or use, reason rejects its lawsuit request lawfully. [typical meaning] this case is before the case of secret of trade of first enroach on that sea court adjudicates. Accuser of existence of this kinds of case wins the lawsuit the characteristic with low rate, because the enterprise is insufficient to the acknowledge of relevant law system,be, and the commercial secret with perfect lack runs a system, in not do one’s best of the quote in lawsuit. This court decision is farther clear responsibility of each quote in commercial secret dispute, conduce to guide an enterprise to promote lawsuit capability, stimulative enterprise perfects commercial secret protection, promotion intellectual property protects a level. The contracted freedom of activity of issue of trade of 5 sufficient respect and market self-discipline guide case to invest market safety to move in order from trade division fund — Shi Mou accuses S company entrusts desk of dispute of contract of conduct financial transactions [basic details of a case] in May 2015, company of Shi Mou, S signed asset government contract, s company sells some to Shi Mou enclosed fund product, both sides was signed ” the risk declares a book ” ” the risk bears degree of classified grading watch ” . The structure of the product divides B of class of A of first step, enterprising class, enterprising, big profit of enterprising class risk is high, portion of enterprising class B needs to assume increase capital cannot resumptive risk. Shi Mou buys share of enterprising class B 3 million yuan, capital is increased after 7.6 million yuan. In June 2016, the capital that the Shi Mou after liquidation can obtain and accrual are 0, shi Mou accuses to the court the requirement is returned still invest a money. [juridical result] the court thinks, shi Mou has fund from job seniority, hold the position of this case to plan to invest the general manager of advisory unit, its are in an unit to be in charge of sending investment statement to S company, its participate in the investment that place experience plans to run, have the management experience that comparative and knowledge. Multiple of this lever of plan of case asset administration is exorbitant be suspected of violating compasses, but nonexistent protect this acceptance, also nonexistent the format provision that removes plaintiff right, do not affect contract effectiveness. S company already made investment risk clew, fulfilled announcement obligation, do not affect Shi Mou venture capital investment to choose. The court adjudicates those who reject Shi Mou to appeal to lawfully beg. [typical meaning] this case is to close fund runs the case of typical trade issue that causes dispute, investor appeals to after fund investment suffers significant loss seek compensation. Freedom of the meaning autonomy that the court should be respected adequately and follows trade issue activity, contract and safeguard trade the principle such as safety, accurate hold fair principle, the right obligation that measures bilateral party concerns. On one hand, want to consider investor meaning freedom to whether be restricted, contract right obligation is apparent not quits; on the other hand, investor suffers a loss, it is the normal market risk that its face, seek redress, lack legal basis. This case is helpful for guiding business victim body to increase risk consciousness, rational investment, the fund investment that is helpful for maintaining stability trades market order, guide and the standard invests health of new job condition to develop from trade division. The responsibility with unidentified agreement of business of car of 6 clear and parallel entrances safeguards case to import car consumer from trade division parallel legitimate rights and interests — Liu Mou appeals to desk of dispute of contract of M company business [basic details of a case] in July 2015, liu Mou and M company sign new car to order sheet, the agreement buys car model to be ” Lu Hu is pulled get the better of administrative lengthen ” . On the sheet that order seat did not have other configuration information outside steering wheel of wood of car of berth of ventilated, around, peach once upon a time, liu Mou pays the gold that order and deposit after. M company informs Liu Mou shifts a car twice early or late, liu Mou configures demur to car and the requirement provides the pertinent information that imports car. August 2015, m company removes the contract confiscates deposit, liu Mou to lodge a complaint. Website of inn of Lu Hu 4S is done not have with ” pull get the better of administrative lengthen ” consistent model, and ” Lu Hu is pulled get the better of ” model car has technical parameter, trends to control commonly wait for a standard to configure a data. [juridical result] the court thinks, m company was not offerred ” pull get the better of administrative lengthen ” the detailed configuration of the model, cannot decide what buy a model to belong to why to plant the configuration of class. The configuration message that makes clear on the sheet that order is too simple, belong to party to ask to the content quality of mark the agreement is unidentified. Parallel importer is in get car information field to have an advantage more, to car configuration and origin agree carry stricter demonstrative obligation and quote responsibility. M company did not prove the car of its consign accords with an agreement, and not consign concerns only evidence, should count beak a contract, should return those who return Liu Mou to buy vehicle fund. [typical meaning] the alternative that parallel entrance ca环保指数668什么意思r offerred diversification for consumer, but put in same brand the problem with unknown agreement of different class car, make consumer generatio深圳按摩推拿哪家好n easily promiscuous. This case is clear when the content agreement such as car configuration information is unidentified, should assume the responsibility that proves its consign car accords with an agreement by parallel importer. This case is helpful for guiding parallel to import car company standard to trade means, make clear car configuration and origin information in detail in the contract, provide relevant data, maintain the authority of know the inside story of consumer and brand option, stimulative parallel imports car industry health to develop. Case 7 establish APP kind the standard promotes the consign of the product to develop quickly from IT of trade division software — H company appeals to desk of dispute of contract of L company business [basic details of a case] in March 2017, h company and L company sign a contract, the agreement maintains put in order by H company provider line of business the relevant service such as government of system of platform of the vocational training guidance, data that maintain put in order, l company pays 450 thousand yuan. On April 1, l company pays 50 thousand yuan, h company offers flow of the business that maintain put in order, wind twice to accuse the respect such as management to groom for L company, on April 18, wear on system of platform of the data that maintain put in order use, deliver to L company. L company approves affix one’s seal of do sth without authorization to sign a contract without company leader with this project for, do not wish to pay later period contract the money, h company appeals to to the court. [juridical result] the court thinks, the contract that both sides signs is lawful and active. This case involves intellectual property kind the business contract of software, according to APP kind in light of the software consign usual practice that runs for download, can go up normally the line moves, and offerred tiring-room management system and consign source code to wait, should regard as lawfully already consign. Experience case APP is developed and go up the line moves, l company rejection lades the U of source code dish, cannot hold H company break a promise, this APP should regard as already consign. H company was offerred according to the contract groom service, reason L company should pay the rest money and relevant interest. [typical meaning] in Internet times, aeriform product trades increasing. The pay issue of APP software, the regulation of active law is not quite perfect. This case carries clear and legislative meaning, namely consign is move is opposite ” content ” controlled right, establish the 3 element: of APP software consign? Qu of ㄏ of the sliding weight of a steelyard of Fei of ü of Qiong of small Bao Ang of shipboard Hui Song is thin bully the establish that achieves Ge? to taste pay level to aeriform products has reference to draw lessons from a meaning. This case is helpful for promoting IT to serve the development of course of study, strengthen the confidence of research and development of technology of intranet sth resembling a net, for HongKong and Macow of another name for Guangdong Province big bay area builds center of innovation of international science and technology to provide judicatory safeguard. Case 8 maintain folk to entrust conduct financial transactions lawfully ” the clause that keep a copy ” effectiveness guiding invests health of standard of industry of conduct financial transactions to develop from trade division — Meng Mou accuses Xu Mou entrusts desk of dispute of contract of conduct financial transactions [basic details of a case] September 2014, meng Mou and Xu Mou sign a contract, conventional: ? Summer is noisy king crab?0 trusts Xu Mou management 10 thousand yuan, xu Mou will entrust amount 10% infiltrate as bail stock account, the accrual of bail and deficit put in Xu Mou ‘s charge entirely, those who be like loss rate to exceed primary capital specified amount 10% when, contract proper motion stops the bail of; Xu Mou and accrual to offset Meng Mou’s loss, if accumulative total gain exceeds 10% of primary capital,the assets specified number that Meng Mou take-overs is; of primary capital specified number, undertake gain allocation. After the contract is signed, meng Mou turns Zhang 220 thousand yuan (it is Xu Mou bail 20 thousand yuan among them) enter stock account, carte blanche Xu Mou manages this account, deficit appears after, meng Mou requests to recoup capital loss. [juridical result] the court thinks, this case both sides forms folk to entrust contract of conduct financial transactions to concern. “The clause that keep a copy ” content is screwy the rule of stock market, disturbed trade normally order, easy cause financial venture, the clause keeping a copy that the other principal part besides stockjobber and other sign should belong to invalid clause. “The clause that keep a copy ” the foundation that entrusts contract of conduct financial transactions as folk and core clause, it is the foundation that the contract exists, its are invalid bring about contract whole to disable. Xu Mou trades in the stock in have dominant effect, did not press after loss happening stop in time about caustic, have apparent fault. Meng Mou signs agreement of invalid conduct financial transactions, also have certain fault. Forensic use one’s discretion maintains Xu Mou to assume 90% responsibility, Meng Mou to assume 10% responsibility. [typical meaning] in recent years, company of investment conduct financial transactions rolls out product of of all kinds banking, the investment that keep a copy becomes the main factor that attracts investor. This case maintains folk clearly to entrust conduct financial transactions to protect bottom clause to disable, from both sides the fault in investment decides assume proportion to losing severally, be helpful for maintaining the stability from order of trade division banking, guide company of conduct financial transactions to be depended on lawfully compasses manage, guide investor to enhance risk consciousness, rational investment. Case mediates the judicatory inside region to affirm new pattern satisfies area of big bay of HongKong and Macow of another name for Guangdong Province to cross border dispute to solve new requirement outside 9 exploration region — Z company accuses X company machines contract dispute desk [basic details of a case] Z company and X company are to register the company that is in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, z company has a processing factory in Shenzhen. Z company and X company sign a contract, conventional X company provides raw material, z company machines steel structure in Shenzhen, carry the factory that is in Hong Kong to X company completes installation. After treatment and installation are finished, bilateral wait for generation dispute with respect to settle accounts of project quality, payment for goods, z company appeals to to the court. [juridical result] this case party all is Hong Kong company, main management staff also is in Hong Kong, all have intercessory intention, but the legal representative of X company cannot arrive temporarily again before sea court accepts mediation. Sea court entrusts adjuster of harbor book specially invite to organize mediation in Hong Kong before, reach intercessory agreement finally. The freewill sex that the court maintains mediation lawfully and the lawful sex that mediate content of main body, process and intercessory agreement, issue ” civil mediation book ” , confirm the legal effectiveness that mediates an agreement. [typical meaning] be in ” one belt all the way ” , below the area of big bay of HongKong and Macow of another name for Guangdong Province, setting that builds ceaseless development to advance from trade division and cooperative area, the demand that party of region inside and outside reconciles outside the condition increases greatly. This case sets out from the angle of convenience party, the sea before entrusting ” one belt all the way ” adjuster of specially invite of center of butt joint appealing to tone is mediated in 深圳商务模特哪里有Hong Kong, the precedent that the judicatory inside the mediation outside region of court of the sea before was being initiated, region affirms, body reveals international trade issue to mediate the advantage with agile, convenient, efficient mechanism, satisfied the judicatory requirement with multivariate body of victim of business of region inside and outside effectively, form the law that new structure opens to offer internationalization outside be being faced completely to ensure to drive. Case 10 penalize lawfully ill will mentions jurisdictional demur behavior aids system of suit of Ou Chengxin of big bay of HongKong and Macow of force another name for Guangdong Province to build — Yuan Mou accuses Zheng Mou equity transfers dispute record [basic details of a case] Yuan Mou and Zheng Mou are signed ” equity makes over an agreement ” hind, zheng Mou did not pay equity to transfer a money by the agreement, yuan Mou to forensic to lodge a complaint. Zheng Mou is with its abode ground for area of Shenzhen city Baoan raise j深圳名媛汇夜总会urisdictional objection. Court lawfully to Zheng Mou Shi Ming, visit the give an official of senior people court according to top people court and Guangdong, sea court is centered before administer a person operating from within in coordination with outside forces of Shenzhen city area under administration by court of other grass-roots unit administer case of thing of Taiwan businessman of HongKong and Macow of experience of first instance concerning foreign affairs or foreign nationals. Yuan Mou is Singapore dweller, this case makes over dispute for equity of concerning foreign affairs or foreign nationals, court of the sea before belonging to administer limits. Zheng Mou still insists to mention jurisdictional demur, still put forward to appeal after forensic ruling rejects his to apply for, 2 careful court maintains original ruling. [juridical result] the court thinks, zheng Mou is in court for many times after Shi Ming, insist to mention the function that the behavior of jurisdictional demur and appeal violated jurisdictional demur system to establish and purpose, broke through the border of party exercise right, violate honest credence principle, damaged the legal right of the the opposing party, cause proceeding serious and protracted, waste judicatory resource, damage judicatory justice and authority. The court decides 30 thousand yuan to fine a RMB to Zheng Mou lawfully. Zheng Mou paid fine actively inside deadline. [typical meaning] this case is before sea court mentions to party ill will jurisdictional demur opens the first piece when go out ” punish sheet ” . Pass this case cognizance, guide party to must follow honest credence principle in civil suit, do not damage the legal right of the the opposing party and protracted lawsuit process so that abuse appeals to authority, otherwise court but according to specific clue, make severe punishment to its lawfully. This case conduces to guide party to reach its to entrust litigant a深圳松岗沐足技师招聘直接电话gent lawsuit of sincere letter reason, area of big bay of HongKong and Macow of the another name for Guangdong Province that help strength, from trade divisio罗湖环保场推荐n and collaboration litigant system builds Ou Chengxin, the law that builds sincere letter fairness changes battalion business environment. (reporter Ma Peigui / Wen Helong / graph)
作者： 
//